Law Firms


Find the clause, cite the source, keep the file in the house.

Contracts, precedents, correspondence, and matter files — searchable across the practice and answerable with citations, on infrastructure that never sends a client file anywhere.

Professional secrecy is the specification

Legal work cannot tolerate two things: fabricated authority and leaked files. Both rule out casual use of public AI tools. A private system solves the custody problem structurally — and solves the fabrication problem with retrieval that cites your own documents or declines.

What the system does

  • Finds the controlling clause across contracts, amendments, and side letters — cited to the document and page
  • Reconstructs matter history: what was argued, agreed, and sent, in order
  • Drafts from precedent with the sources attached for partner review
  • Searches internal know-how and past opinions the practice already paid to produce
  • Enforces matter-level access separation — ethical walls become system walls
  • Logs every retrieval and answer per matter — inspectable, exportable

Custody posture

Law-office deployments run on-premises, typically as a Vault-tier system in the firm’s own room, with role separation mirroring the firm’s ethical walls. Air-gapped variants exist for practices whose client base warrants them.

The system retrieves and drafts with sources. It does not give legal advice and it does not replace professional judgement — it makes your own files answer faster.

Your precedents, answering in seconds.

The confidential architecture review scopes matter separation, archive shape, and the right system tier — before any file is touched.

Request a confidential architecture review