Tracker-free public surface
The site uses no analytics, advertising pixels, external fonts, cookies or contact form. The Fit Check runs locally.
Trust Centre
This page describes ANULUM’s public control model and present evidence. Project-specific controls, obligations and assurance exist only when written into an engagement.
The site uses no analytics, advertising pixels, external fonts, cookies or contact form. The Fit Check runs locally.
First contact requires no documents. Deeper access is scoped by purpose, participants, location, authority and retention.
Models, serving engines and hardware are selected against an acceptance set; no single vendor is represented as the permanent control plane.
Models, data, prompts, retrieval, tools and infrastructure are versioned and should be promoted only through explicit approval and regression evidence.
Official, measured, calculated and provisional claims stay distinct. Negative findings belong in the decision packet.
Export, restoration, key ownership, data return or deletion and operational handover are part of scope—not an afterthought.
“Swiss-hosted” alone does not answer these questions. Each deployment records them separately.
The signed project documents—not this website—determine the final allocation.
Swiss data-protection law applies directly to AI-supported personal-data processing; the FDPIC highlights transparency and impact assessment for high-risk processing. Liechtenstein’s FMA states that DORA applies there through its implementation framework from 1 February 2025. ANULUM can map technical evidence to a client-defined obligation set; it does not certify compliance or replace counsel.
Where assurance is required, the engagement identifies the required reviewer, evidence, scope and gate before the claim may be made.
Start with the public vendor checklist or ask for a bounded due-diligence discussion.